Breaking News

Across North America, forests evolved with natural disturbance processes such as wildfire and cycles of native insects like bark beetles. The scale and intensity of these processes varied widely in a dynamic dance of constant change, shaping forest structure and the life within it.

This is not about protecting communities from wildfire. This is a blank check for the logging-industrial complex, written in the language of crisis.

Fire is natural and ecologically essential in U.S. forests. There is no scientific disagreement about this. But a political narrative has been circulating in recent years, asserting that it is infeasible to simply manage public forests with fire because many are too dense, or have not burned in many decades.

The real wildfire disasters occur when communities are impacted, and the real driver of community wildfire disasters is exposure: ember-driven, structure-to-structure ignition, a reality that the FOFA logging bill largely ignores.

Americans deserve wildfire legislation that defends people, not smoke-filled headlines. While tragedies like the LA fires rightly drew attention, the political narrative used them to push policy rather than reflect the broader reality.

Public lands and taxpayers deserve solutions grounded in demonstrated outcomes – not a logging-first narrative repeatedly contradicted by the very fires used to justify it.

The early contours of “Reconciliation 2.0” are deeply concerning: punitive fees on environmental litigation, expanded categorical exclusions for forest management, and broader efforts to dilute procedural environmental protections under the banner of efficiency. These moves are not about resilience. They are about shifting power from communities and public accountability back toward concentrated interests.

As the year winds down, it’s worth taking a moment to celebrate the wild, wonderful forces of nature that shape our landscapes—from fire to flood to beetle outbreaks. These natural disturbances, often demonized in mainstream narratives, are actually the rhythms that sustain resilient forests and ecosystems. We’re also grateful for a little legislative good fortune:…

What we see here is a completely missed opportunity. The voters polled want Roadless Area protection; they want to protect wildlife. They are afraid of wildfire and want forests to be protected from wildfire, and they disfavor logging. Once you look at the facts and lean into correcting the misunderstandings, the path for a truly protective Roadless Rule is available.

FOFA doesn’t protect homes. It prioritizes backcountry logging while removing public oversight and environmental review, giving federal agencies unchecked authority — all without ensuring communities are actually safer.