Fire Management Is the Story. Logging Is What’s Happening.

We just returned from another round of visits to the giant sequoia groves of the southern Sierra Nevada, and we came back with field observations from four sites and two new studies that dismantle nearly everything the agencies have been telling the public about sequoias, fire, and what these forests actually need. Here is what we saw.

Read More

Fire Is Not the Crisis. Logging Bills Called Wildfire Bills Are.

Democratic senators cannot continue lending credibility to the wildfire-as-extraction framework and then express surprise when that framework is used to extract. Every time a Democrat praises the underlying bill, cites its bipartisan credentials, or treats the Roadless Rule repeal as the only problem in the room, they provide institutional cover for a policy direction that degrades the ecosystems that regulate our climate and does nothing meaningful to protect the communities fire actually threatens.

Read More

Roundup Was the Symptom. The Intervention Reflex Is the Disease.

Having correctly identified that our national forests are being managed like tree farms — that the Roundup exists to clear the way for commercially valuable conifers — the film’s conclusion pivoted to: our forests don’t need Roundup. They need replanting and thinning. I understand the impulse. You’ve spent a year documenting institutional failure and you want to hand the audience a solution. But that solution is just Roundup with better PR. It is, in the most precise sense of the phrase, missing the forest for the trees.

Read More

SOS Act NGO Opposition Letter

We, the undersigned organizations, urge you to oppose S. 4103, the so-called “Save Our Sequoias Act” (Sen. Padilla, D-CA, Sen. Curtis, R-UT). Contrary to its deceptive name, this is a deeply destructive logging bill.

Read More

Collaboration: Panacea or Pitfall?

PIELC, March 2026 | © Jennifer Mamola

At the 2026 Public Interest Environmental Law Conference, Dr. Chad Hanson joined a group of experienced voices to examine how collaborative groups are influencing decisions across public lands. This panel takes a candid look at these concerns and questions whether collaboratives groups are truly serving our public lands or undermining them.

Read More