In The News

Los Angeles Times
By Doug Smith

Recalling my experience with Hanson, I suggested we go off-trail up the brushy slope. As we pushed our way through, saplings appeared on all sides, hidden until we came within a few feet.

Inside Climate News
By Katie Surma

The Fix Our Forests Act is a logging bill cynically masquerading as a community wildfire protection measure, and the bitter irony is that the bill would likely exacerbate wildfires and put communities at even greater risk.

Los Angeles Times
By Doug Smith

The McNally fire wiped out whole forests in 2002. What does it tell us today about the future of vast areas devastated by recent fires?

Los Angeles Times
By Doug Smith

“A standing dead tree is vastly more important to wildlife and biodiversity in the forest than a standing live tree of the same size,” he said. “A tree in the forest ecosystem may have two or three hundred years of incredibly important vital life after it dies.”

Random Lengths News
By Paul Rosenberg

[Hanson] cites three reasons it could actually increase the fire threat: by diverting resources, by giving a false sense of security, and by “removing trees and other vegetation” that “reduces wind friction and increases the speed of wildfires,” so that “they reach towns faster,” leaving less time for people to safely evacuate and for first responders to arrive and help.

Daily Montanan
By Jordan Hansen

“We’ll do all these logging operations, we’ll call it thinning and fuel reduction, with a wink and a nod, and it will tell communities it’ll stop the fire from reaching the towns,” Hanson said. “And that is a dangerous lie, because that’s not what’s happening. The fires are blowing right through those thin areas.”

It’s the same logic the Fix Our Forest Act is based on, Hanson said, which is why it’s drawn criticism from some environmental groups like the Alliance for the Wild Rockies and EarthJustice.

TRUTHOUT
By Mike Ludwig

Supporters of rescinding the Roadless Rule argue it creates barriers to active forest management and efforts to prevent wildfires that are intensifying with climate change, such as clearing potential fuel for fire. However, like [Jennifer] Mamola, Huffman says this is misleading.

TusconSentinel.com
By Paul Ingram

“We need more wild, intact ecosystems—vibrant landscapes that include everything from bustling post-fire snag forests to ancient old growth,” said Jennifer Mamola of the John Muir Project. “Nature has governed itself for eons and must continue to do so if we’re to protect biodiversity, store carbon, and sustain air and clean water.”

FOX13 Now
By Chris Reed

But ecologist Chad Hanson, the co-founder of the John Muir Project, said it’s a myth that forest mitigation prevents wildfires. “The most current research is telling us that the speed of fires is the key factor,” said Hanson. “And the one thing that almost all the science agrees on now is that removing trees from forests
increases the speed of fires, typically by a large degree.”

Sierra: The Magazine of the Sierra Club
By Alexander Nazaryan

The commission is “less a conservation effort and more a political stunt,” said Jennifer Mamola, policy director of the John Muir Project, which has decried the Trump administration’s efforts to expand logging in national forests. “It repackages extractive agendas under the guise of patriotism and public service. Despite its language around stewardship, this initiative promotes deregulation, expanded industrial access, and voluntary measures that have historically failed to protect ecosystems.”